Thursday, November 12, 2020

Building a NaI(Tl)-based scintillating Gamma Spectroscopy detector

I decided to build my own Gamma Spectroscopy detector - I needed a second one to experiment with coincidence counting and realized that it was not going to be very difficult to assemble the detector myself. In addition, I wanted to use a larger crystal for this build and have a detector with a bit higher efficiency than my other two detectors. 

I had a damaged Scionix-Holland 38B57 (from an Exploranium GR-135) laying around. These detectors can not be repaired due to their integrated design (the bare scintillation crystal and the PMT are glued together before they are sealed) but this unit was going to provide me with a few usable parts that I managed to salvage - namely the Voltage Divider PCB, some Mu-Metal shielding and the stainless steel enclosure with an end-cap. 

The main components for the new detector were procured from eBay.

Photomultiplier Tube

I opted for Hamamatsu R980 PMT. This is exactly the same tube used in the Scionix-Holland 38B57 detector and I am familiar with this tube - I worked with it when rebuilding a couple of 38B57s.
R980 is designed for scintillation counting and gamma cameras and it is optimized for use with NaI(Tl) crystals. It is a 10-stage photomultiplier tube with 38mm diameter and Bialkali Photocathode. 

The datasheet for Hamamatsu R980 can be found HERE

Emission spectra of NaI(Tl), CsI(Tl) and CeBr3, scaled on maximum emission intensity.
Also a typical quantum efficiency curve of a Bialkali photocathode and a Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPm) are shown above.

Wavelength of maximum response for R980 is 420nm which is almost ideal match for the NaI(Tl) emission spectra.

I purchased the PMT tube from iRad Inc on eBay (Thank you Tom!). The exact model is Hamamatsu R980-19 which is identical to the standard R980 with the exception of the already installed voltage divider board on the back (designed for GE/Gamma Camera). 
This tube was made in China, not Japan but I am convinced that it is going to be just as good. Japanese tubes are older, much difficult to find, more expensive and I doubt they will provide enough of a difference to warrant the trouble of obtaining one.

The "business end" of the photomultiplier tube. The dark-brownish coating on the inside of the glass window is the Photocathode.
The glass window was thoroughly cleaned with Acetone from any dust particles and fingerprints. 

I didn't bother with figuring out and reverse-engineering of the voltage divider installed on the -19 variant. Glancing at the board indicated that the values of the resistors were not what I needed so I decided to scrap the entire VD board for now and removed it from the tube.
I will probably look into the board and see if it can be converted easily for another project. 

Using the PCB from the damaged 38B57, all components were stripped, the board was cleaned and a new set of components were installed with value for R=2MOhm.
The resistors I installed are Vishay TNPV12062M00BEEN (Digikey 541-2324-1-ND) SMD 1206 2 MOhm 0.1% 1/4W Thin Film High Voltage resistors.
The filter capacitors are Kemet C1812C103KGRACAUTO (Digikey 399-16777-1-ND) SMD 1812 Ceramic 10nF / 2000V X7R 10%.
All resistors were selected from a larger pool, with an LCR Bridge to closely match their values between each-other so tolerance was somewhat better than 0.1%.
The picture above shows the component placement on the reworked VD of the original 38B57 board - fortunately the PCB layout worked out perfectly and I only had to add a single jumper wire, while using the old pads.

The schematic of the "classic" PMT voltage divider I used. 
This schematic shows 120MOhm voltage divider which is more suitable for counting with a battery powered equipment due to the higher impendence. 
Normally, for Spectrometry, 1M/2M resistors in VD are used with lab-grade power supplies (total impedance of 12 MOhm) but I wanted to help a bit the GS-USB-PRO power supply so I went ahead with R/2R as 2 Mohm / 4 MOhm VD (total of 24 MOhm). Another option would be using 1.5MOhm resistors as a good compromise.
The voltage divider board installed on the leads of the PMT. 
I left the Anode and Cathode leads slightly longer than then the Dynode leads as they will serve as connection points for the coaxial cable going to the BNC/SHV connector.
A layer of electrical tape was applied to act as a light shielding and also protecting the tube's glass envelope from being scratched by the magnetic shielding sleeve.

I wrapped the first Mu-Metal magnetic shield around the PMT and covered it with a layer of electrical tape. The Mu-Metal shield is grounded to the Cathode lead of the PMT on the bottom side the PCB.
Shielding is very important as external electrostatic and magnetic interference, including Earth's magnetic field can affect the path of the electrons when when they are just emitted by the Photocathode and even when bouncing from Dynode to Dynode.
In my design, I use two layers of Mu-Metal sleeves - first layer covers the back of the PMT in the area around the Dynodes and the second layer, added later, shields the entire PMT assembly.

Scintillating Crystal

The scintillation crystal - NaI(Tl) or Sodium Iodide doped with Thallium is the "heart" of the detector and extra care should be taken when selecting and purchasing one. NaI(Tl) is by far the most widely used general purpose-scintillator material and produces excellent results for the cost.
The crystal I obtained is 25% larger than a typical 1.5" x 2.5" crystal used in many detectors - the size of this crystal is 40mm x 80mm (~1.5" x 3.1") which should result in a bit better efficiency.

The crystal is encapsulated in a thin aluminum canister with reflective material surrounding it and a glass optical window for interfacing with the Photomultiplier.
The Sodium Iodide is an extremely hygroscopic substance and the crystal must be hermetically sealed or moisture from the air will quickly "hydrolyze" and destroy it.

My crystal was procured from an eBay seller located in Ukraine.
Looking at the label at the bottom and the accompanied paperwork, it was produced in May 1997 either in Russia or Ukraine.
There are some really high quality NOS NaI(Tl) crystals made in Russia and the cost is extremely competitive even when compared with the new ones coming from China. There is a good variety of sizes to choose from as well.
 Unfortunately, some NOS crystals are really old and seals might have leaked so one should be sure of the condition before purchase.

This is what a good crystal should look like, when viewed thru the optical window - completely clear with no cracks or fractures, no yellowing due to moisture / age, no stains on the reflective coating, no cloudiness in the crystal, etc. It pretty much should look as if there is nothing in the canister (speaking of "crystal clear" :-).
This one looks absolutely clear and pristine!

There is a lot of junk on eBay, sometimes sold for absolutely outrages prices - yellowed, broken, hydrolyzed and some crystals that are completely unusable even for counting. I highly recommend that one should request detailed pictures before buying a pricey crystal and to stay away from anything that shows imperfections - if the window seal or integrity of the encapsulation canister is compromised, it is just a matter of time before the crystal is spoiled by moisture. Any internal yellowing and cracks will surely result in poor light output, decreased efficiency and lower resolution.


Unfortunately, when mating a Japanese PMT and a Russian crystal some difference in the standards is to be expected. 
The PMT has 38mm (1.5") diameter while the glass window of the crystal container is with 40mm diameter. The aluminum canister itself has 46mm OD.
This small mismatch should not be a big deal and I don't think that many photons will be lost around the edge. Ideally, the PMT's photocathode area should be exact or larger size than the crystal's window but only 1-2 mm around is not that much of a gap and the wasted area is ~122 sq. mm. A negligible loss in resolution is to be expected. The next size over is a 2" PMT (51mm) which would be a much better fit but I just didn't want to deal with the implications - fabricating larger housing, building larger lead shielding, etc.
In addition, I use my detectors mainly in a head-on application and this results in most photons generated alongside the main optical axis of the assembly rather than from the side walls. With a reflector surrounding the crystal the probability of losing low-energy photons in the narrow gap is fairly small.

In order to couple the different size devices, I designed an adapter in TinkerCAD which serves a double purpose - it centers the PMT over the glass window of the crystal canister and also serves as a reflector to bounce back any photons escaping from the difference gap and the side glass of the PMT's photocathode window.

The adapter ring 3D-printed with resin using SLA printing technology.
The ID on the PMT side is 38mm and on the crystal side is 46mm. There is a 4mm of tapering in the middle which is painted with ultra-bright white paint.
The 4 extended "fingers" of the crown are used to glue the adapter to the crystal canister with RTV sealant.

Optical interface compounds ensure that there is no reflection / refraction from each glass-to-air surface and the photons will pass between the crystal and the Photocathode of the PMT efficiently with maximum light transfer and minimal loss.
These compounds are usually silicone-based - a grease is sold by iRad Inc. and I found that RC Car differential fluid (60 000 cSt or higher), which is extremely viscous, much thicker than honey and it barely flows, while crystal-clear at the same time works extremely well.

Coupling with silicone grease. 
A dab of the compound is applied in the center and then the PMT is gently pressed with a circular motion to squeeze out all of the excess grease and spread it evenly, leaving a very thin film between the two glass surfaces. 
I tested also the heavy silicone-based RC Car differential fluid (100 000 cSt) and this is what I currently use as I noticed a very slight improvement in resolution with it.

Both components are pressed together and secured with a tight wrap of electrical tape binding them firmly together. 8 vertical strips of tape are pulling both components together and multiple turns of tape around the perimeter secures and seals everything.
It is important that all of the excess silicone grease is thoroughly cleaned in order for the adhesive tape to establish good and tight coupling. 
No excessive force should be used either as the interface between the two glass surfaces is just a thin film of silicone fluid and damage can occur if pressed too hard.

The second layer of Mu-Metal magnetic shielding. 
I soldered the Mu-Metal sheet into a tight-fitting sleeve which was placed over the PMT and the sleeve was connected to the the Cathode lead of the PMT, just like with the first layer of shielding.
This second sleeve covers the entire length of the tube and shields the area of the Photocathode where the electrons, just emitted and heading for the first Dynode have minimum energy and are easily deflected by external magnetic fields.
There is an "edge effect" where the shielding effectiveness drops at each edge of the cylinder. This means that ideally, the Mu-shield should be overlapping and extending beyond the boundaries of the PMT. In my design the condition is met at the dynode side but the shield is a bit short on the photocathode side - it ends at the photocathode plane while in reality, it should be extending beyond the photocathode and overlapping the crystal but I don't expect this to be an issue of any significance.

The stainless steel cylindrical enclosure, left over from the damaged 38B57 detector was placed over the PMT assembly and secured to the crystal's encapsulation canister with electrical tape. This worked perfectly well as the PMT is a bit shorter than the enclosure and leaves enough room in the back for the end-cap, the coax interconnect and the coax connector.
 Although this enclosure does not cover the crystal canister, it does provide additional shielding and mechanical stability / protection for the PMT and completes nicely the entire assembly, giving it a very solid feel.

Plenty of space is left for the coaxial pigtail and the connector installed on the aluminum end-cap.
I decided to go for a single cable VD which provides both - PMT high-voltage bias and transfers the signal to the driver but should one chooses to use two cable design, both connectors HV and Signal can be installed as there is a plenty of room.

The Kings 1704-1 SHV (Safe High-Voltage) type connector is rated for up to 5000V / 5A and even though I am powering the PMT with only 700-800V, it still makes a more reliable and safe connection at these high voltages. 
These connectors are not very common but this also prevents connection errors as they would not mate with standard BNCs. The main disadvantage is the need for special cables - again eBay is a good source for complete SHV cable assemblies.

The coaxial cable shielding, Mu-Metal shielding and the stainless steel cylindrical enclosure are all connected and grounded to the PMT's Cathode lead. 
The center conductor of the coax is connected to the Anode lead.

A 2" heat-shrink tubing was applied over the crystal encapsulation and partly covers the stainless steel enclosure.
This secures the assembly better, covers and seals the tape and provides some mechanical shock protection to the thin-wall aluminum canister of the scintillating crystal.
I used very thin heat-shrink which did not require much heat to activate in order to avoid excessive heating of the crystal. The heat-shrinking was done it short burst with time for cooling to prevent the crystal temperature from raising.

Words of caution (!):

1. Using heat-shrink tubing over the crystal must be done very carefully to avoid overheating and thermal shock to the crystal, which will damaged it. 

2. The Photomultiplier tube should never be powered when exposed to daylight or even ambient room light - such action will immediately deplete / destroy the super-sensitive Photocathode. Any testing should be done in a light-tight enclosure, in a complete darkness, with the only source of light being the scintillation crystal. Removing of the enclosure end-cap while the tube is powered could also cause light leakage thru the back side of the PMT.


The complete detector assembly of DGB-1531. 
Overall dimensions (without the connector) are 225mm x 50mm.The black area is the NaI(Tl) crystal and the rest is the enclosure with the PMT and VD.
I shall call it "Da Gamma Bee" (DGB) because of the black/yellow pattern and ability to collect high-energy photons :-)

Initially, the connection to the Gamma Spectacular GS-USB-PRO driver was done with a standard Teflon dielectric BNC type connector but later I replaced it with SHV type connector for consistency with my other, GS-1525 detector. 
This way I can use the same cable with both detectors.

A very quick-n-dirty test shows 6.8% resolution at 700V. 
(screen capture shows 6.9% due the excited Photocathode by the daylight, right after detector assembly. It improved to 6.8% a few hours later)
Larger crystals tend to have slightly lower resolution but better efficiency - it is a trade off and for NaI(Tl) crystal of this size, I think 6.8% is pretty good. Basically, the thicker the crystal is, the more matter there is in the path of the high-energy photon and there is a higher probability for interaction, thus the higher efficiency.
My GS-USB-PRO currently is precisely tuned for the GS-1525 detector and I didn't want to mess with the signal shape filter or the output volume level at this time but I am sure after a few tweaks the result will get even better.
This VD produces slightly lower signal level at the same bias voltage compared to my GS-1525 detector and to compensate for it without adjusting the volume pot, I just increased the Audio gain to 1.5 in the software. The pulse width is also a bit shorter than optimal 100uS but this can be easily adjusted with the Shape filter of the Gamma Spectacular unit when I fine tune it.
I will also need to determine the optimal bias voltage for the PMT to achieve the best linearity - using Eu-152 or Th source with multiple peaks at different energies and a special Excel sheet this can be done fairly easy.
As a preliminary observation - the background radiation count is higher with the detector I have built (137.5 CPS) when compared to my GS-1525 detector (108.8 CPS). This is a good sign and a significant increase (~26%) in the sensitivity due to the larger crystal volume (~25%) and/or PMT (Hamamatsu R980 (Gain 3.7 x 10^5) vs. ADIT B38B01 (Gain 3.0 x 10^5)) but more testing will be needed with a low activity test sample to precisely quantify the improvement.

The "classic" Cs-137 spectrum obtained with the newly built detector.

I must say - It is a very good start! Overall, I am really happy with the end results and I am looking forward to optimizing and tuning the entire setup.
This whole effort is also a proof that if on budget, one can build a quality GS detector for just a fraction of the cost, normally charged for similar (or lesser) devices by companies which cater to the hobbyists. 
It only took me a day to build it, once I had all the parts.

Monday, September 21, 2020

Lead Pig / Vault for Radioactive Isotope Sealed Disk Sources

 The Sealed Isotope Disk Sources by Spectrum Techniques are extremely useful as reference / calibration sources for Gamma Spectroscopy and for an incredible variety of experiments and research, involving radioactivity. 

These 1" Plexiglass (PMMA) disks are offered as a large assortment of isotopes at various activity levels, ranging from as low as 0.05 μCi to as high as 10 μCi for some isotopes. They afford safe handling of the radioactive material - the actual source isotope is completely sealed with epoxy resin, in the center of the disk, inside a 0.250" diameter hole (except for the Po-210 (Alpha) source disks which uses a special substrate and Mylar foil). The material is located 0.5 mm from the back surface (non-labeled side) of the disk.

I use a few of these disks as calibration sources for my Gamma Spectrometer setup. 
One does not need a special license to own them (the disks are "U.S. NRC and State Exempt Quantity") but keep in mind - they are still regulated by NRC! For example - it is illegal to sell / transfer them, lend them or ship the sources to a 3rd party. It is also illegal to stack disks in order to achieve higher activity and so on.

The problem I had, is with storing them safely - the disk sources are shipped in these simple acrylic storage cases with just some foam padding and virtually no shielding whatsoever. 

Imagine, during experiments that you need to shuffle a bunch of these 10 μCi isotope disks on your workbench - such radiation exposure is not only unnecessary but can easily be avoided with a proper storage solution.

I tried a number of off-the-shelf "lead pigs" but all of them were cylindrical, "pill-bottle" type containers, which in this case is just a huge waste of space & metal. The worst part was that every time, I needed a specific source, I had to dump all disks on my desk and fumble through them to get the one I need, then put the others back in the container. 

I decided to build my own custom DIY container for such sources - this is a super-simple, inexpensive, half-day project.

My design goals for the container were rather simple: a small footprint, easy to carry, at least 3/4" of lead shielding all around, fast and easy access to any source (no stacking) and a fast way to restore the shielded state after removing or replacing a disk.

For shielding, I cast 6 lead brick using "1kg Graphite ingot mold" (sourced from eBay for $15) and 99.9% pure lead melted from ingots. Each brick is over 0.750 kg of Lead and the size is approx. 3 1/2" x 1 1/2" x 3/4".

I built a custom-sized wooden box to house the lead brick assembly, featuring a carry handle (~11 Lbs. of Lead inside!), a hinged lid and a lid lock. The box was constructed using 3/4" thick pine stock and has external dimensions ~6.5" x 5" x 3 3/4". The internal dimensions are specific to my lead brick configuration - 5" x 3 1/2" x 2 1/2". The bottom is made of 1/2" thick plywood. The box was finished with a few coats of polyurethane varnish for protection and low-profile non-slip feet were mounted on the bottom.

The Lead bricks are an intended "tight fit" inside the box. 
The bricks forming the bottom and the top of the shielded volume were lined with a thin layer of closed-cell foam ("Neoprene") padding. 
The top cover metal brick has 4 countersink stainless steel screws mounted in each corner. These screws serve as adjustable "stand-offs" with the protruding portion of the screw-head forming a gap, adjusted to accommodate the thickness of the source disks (0.175").
The other 4 lead bricks form the sides of the shielded volume.
The combined thickness of the left, middle and right bricks dictate the exact internal width of the wooden box as the mold can be filled with different amounts of lead during casting. The goal is to build the external box to close tolerances so the lead bricks cant move around once inserted.

This configuration works perfectly well for up to 3 disks but can accommodate as many as 6 disks (in two layers) if necessary (the stand-off screws need to be readjusted for a larger gap in this case ~0.35"). 
The small volume left to the front of the brick assembly currently has a 1/2" plywood "gap filler" but can accommodate a small tube with tweezers for handling the disk sources or a container for less radioactive sources (K-40, Lu-176). Alternatively, one can cut / shorten the left and right bricks by 1/2" and build the wooden box accordingly.

The top (cover) brick in place, completely shielding the source disks.

 The little U-shaped handle on the top brick has a dual purpose - it sits flush with the top edge of the wooden box, thus preventing the brick from shifting when the wooden cover is closed and secured, essentially locking the brick into place.

For handling the source disks, instead of using tweezers, I realized that a SMD Vacuum tool, normally used for handling SMD components during PCB placement could work well. 

The vacuum tool allows you to grab individual disks and position them, while increasing the distance between one's hand and the source, just like a pair of tweezers will do but I find it more convenient to extract the disks from the tight space of the test chamber with this tool. 

I will probably post a laminated reference table on the inside of the wooden cover, listing the gamma energies of my calibration isotopes.

With 3 disks inside (each of them 1 μCi) of Eu-152, Co-60  and Cs-137, my LND7317-based Geiger Counter reads only 550-600 CPM (~0.16 mR/h) on the top surface of the wooden box. With the top shielding block removed, the top surface reads 2100 CPM (~0.6 mR/h)

If sources with "softer" gammas are stored the attenuation would be even better but Co-60 with it's energies over 1MeV is not attenuated as well by 3/4" thick lead.

As a bit of curiosity - the disposal instructions for these disk sources are rather bizarre if you are not an NRC Licensee : One should deface the source, removing / painting over / scratching off any "Radioactive" signs from the disk and then just throw the disk away in the regular household garbage. 

(I guess nobody cares about the guy at the waste disposal plant, where the disks might be pulverized going through the plastic recycling mill)

Wednesday, July 29, 2020

Radium-226 Spectrum

I was running my spectrometer thru its paces and figured that Ra-226 is a good isotope to test with. Radium thanks to Madame Curie is an "evergreen classic" after all :-) (well maybe not quite "evergreen" - half-life is 1600 years)

There is a good spread of peaks coming from Pb-214 and 

I calibrated using my usual process - K-40 -> LYSO crystal -> Cs-137 while doing some adjustments in the Theremino's MCA "Linearizer" feature. 
Running the Radium spectrum after calibration placed the peaks spot-on telling me that the linearity after the adjustments is rather excellent - from the low energy spectrum (Pb-210 @ 46.5 keV) where NaI(Tl) detector has a relatively poor linearity (for any energies less than 100 keV) all the way to above 2.2 MeV. I labeled the K-40 peak for reference as it is almost always present in spectrograms.
This spectrum was obtained during a 12 hr scan, preceded by about 9 hrs of Background radiation scan for subtraction, all with my normal lead shielding.

These Radium watch hands still glow in the dark. The sample activity at 5mm from LND7311 Geiger tube, thru the glass (no Alpha) is approx. 120-130 cpm. 
The watch hands were placed at 1 cm from the bottom of the detector crystal inside the lead shielding.

Here is another Radium spectrum. This is about 0.5 grams of Radium Sulfate in a sealed vial - scan duration is about 8.5 Hrs. The Radium Sulfate was precipitated from Uranium "Yellow Cake" but also includes some of the natural Uranium as salts - evidence is the 143.76 keV peak from U-235, not found in the Radium paint spectrum (which obviously underwent a better purification).

I am quite happy with the resolution of the detector and the background noise suppression by my shielding. Obviously it is not a CeBr3 detector but NaI (Tl) detectors have lower background noise compared to CeBr3 or LaBr3 and when you don't try to resolve peaks that are too close to each other it works very well for such cost-efficiency. 
Both CeBe3 is LaBr3 crystals have impurities of Ac-227 but LaBr3 also has also intrinsic activity due to the presence of the naturally occurring La-138 (0.09%). Some very weak peaks will get swamped in the higher background counts from a LaBr3 detector. CeBr3 detectors on the other hand are wicked expensive and you still need to find a "cherry-picked" one with lower Ac-227 impurities. I think I'll stick to the good old NaI(Tl) for now or maybe venture and test the CsI (Tl).

Sunday, July 26, 2020

Some specimens from my Radioactive Mineral Collection

My previous post about the Trinitite inspired me to post pictures of some of my minerals.
I have well over a hundred different Uranium, Thorium and REE mineral specimens in my private collection. Here are some of my favorite ones - it was a difficult pick indeed.
Some of these rocks are as "hot" as they look pretty, exceeding activity of 100K cpm so keeping them on my desk unfortunately is out of question!

Autunite crystals ("books") * Menzanschwand * Baden * Germany *
When it comes to Uranium minerals, Autunite is one of the "classic" secondary minerals. 
There is no radioactive mineral collection without at least one Autunite sample.

Autunite crystals on matrix. All are from Marysvale Mining District * Utah

Here is a beautiful sample of Boltwoodite crystals growing on Calcite from the Goanikontes Claim * Namibia.

Cubic Uraninite var. Gummite – excellent specimen of several cubic uraninite crystals being replaced by yellow and orange Gummite as an overall approx. 3.5cm x 2cm x 1.5cm specimen and is associated with minor muscovite mica. 
From the Fanny Gouge Mine, Micaville, Celo, Yancey County, North Carolina.
This particular specimen is extremely "hot" - well over 300 000 cpm.

Meta-Autunite * Dahl Mine - Mt. Spokane, Washington

Beautiful Torbernite * Shaba Province * Congo. I absolutely love the translucent green crystals. The activity of this sample is pretty high - it seems the more beautiful radioactive crystals are, the higher activity they exhibit.

Uranocircite crystals * Bergen * Saxony * Germany *

Here is a beautiful sample of Uranocircite and Heinrichite growing on brecciated Fluorite matrix from Menzenschwand * Germany

Outstanding Uranophane specimen from the Krunkelbach Valley Uranium deposit * Germany.

Zippeite – bright yellow micro-crystals.  From the Grants Mining District, New Mexico.

Bright yellow Phosphuranylite micro-crystals on matrix from Arcu su Linnarbu, Capoterra, Metropolitan City of Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy. 

This Ce rich Monazite crystal is from the Ambatofotsikely pegmatite in Betsohana, Mandoto, Vakinankaratra, Madagascar. The radioactivity is due to present Thorium and it counts over 20 000 cpm. I was pretty lucky to find it - it is well terminated on all sides - a "floater" with no obvious attachment point.

Monazite (twinned crystal cluster) from Spirito Santo, SW Region of Brazil

Uraninite var. Pitchblende (botryoidal) with Chalcopyrite from Shaft #11 near Lešetice, Pribram District, Czech Republic. (collected in 2018)

Uraninite var. Pitchblende* small botryoidal specimen from Shaft #16 near Háje, Pribram District, Czech Republic.

Uraninite var. Pitchblende* botryoidal specimen, collected in 2018 from Shaft #4 near Lešetice, Pribram District, Czech Republic.
This sample clocks 150 000 CPM at 1cm.

A beautiful Uranophane and Uranocircite on Granit, specimen from Menzenschwand, near Feldberg, Black Forest * Germany.

Autunite on Matrix from Les Oudots Quarry, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France

The Autunite fluoresces bright Green under all UV wavelengths and it looks quite spectacular.

Rutherfordine on Uraninite - from Musonoi, Kolwezi, Katanga * Zaire (nowadays Democratic Republic of Congo). Collected in the late '60s - early '70s.
This specimen, smaller than a US Penny is clocking over 23 000 CPM.
 Rutherfordine is one of my favorite minerals because of who it is named after.
Rutherfordine is nearly pure Uranyl Carbonate (UO₂)CO3.

Betafite Crystal from the Silver Crater Mine, Bancroft, Faraday Township, Ontario, Canada. 
The Silver Crater Mine is one of the premium sources of these dodecahedral crystals.

Tyuyamunite in Calcite from Santa Eulalia * Mexico

Uranoplite on Coffinite / Pitchblende matrix.
Highly fluorescent specimen from Les Mares III, Lodeve, Languedoc-Roussilon, France.
Activity is around 100 000 CPM at 1cm.

For anyone interested in Radioactive Minerals I can't say enough about this book by Robert J. Lauf - this is the "Bible" of radioactive minerals and an incredibly informative book.

It is very well organized not only by mineral species but by localities as well. It is the ultimate reference for Uranium and Thorium minerals.