Commercial scintillating detectors are usuallu very expensive - hundreds, often thousands of dollars for a good size NaI(Tl) detector. Such detectors are not always affordable for amateurs, even on the secondhand market but for many applications they are the optimal, and sometimes the only solution.
There is a hidden, and often overlooked and underestimated gem though, made by a leading in the scintillator business Dutch company - the Scionix-Holland 38B57. This detector is nearly impossible to beat when it comes to value and it is pretty much "the best bang for the buck", delivering an incredible performance for its very low cost on the used parts market. The detector was manufactured as an OEM part about 10-15 years ago and not available for purchase as "new" but there are plenty of salvaged units out there, offered by various Internet sellers.
The 38B57 is a "classic" NaI(Tl) detector - the crystal is 38mm by 57mm (1.5" x 2.25"), surrounded by reflective powder, coupled with a 38mm Hamamatsu R980 10-stage head-on PMT and mounted in an Aluminum + Stainless Steel tube enclosure.
38B57 is employing an integrated design - the NaI(Tl) crystal is not encapsulated in its own aluminum canister, but it is directly interfaced (glued) to the PMT's Head-On photocathode window and then both, PMT's front part and the scintillating crystal are sealed together in an air-tight aluminum can. The assembly is wrapped with the Mu-metal magnetic / electrostatic shielding and together with the VD PCB is housed in a stainless-steel tube with an aluminum end-cap.
The integrated design keeps the cost down, but it means that this detector is not really serviceable beyond its voltage divider circuit / PCB - crystal and PMT cannot be decoupled from each-other and replaced without the complete destruction of the detector - this is one of the down sides of such design.
38B57 on the other hand, is a really a high-quality, spectroscopy grade detector and the lack of an additional glass window in front of the crystal improves the resolution by reducing photon refraction and/or reflection which would normally occur with the extra glass window of an encapsulated crystal.
These detectors will often show up on eBay for as little as $80/ a piece (at the time of this writing, but prices do change) and sometimes for even less, making "good size NaI(Tl) Scintillator for under $100" possible!
Obviously, if the PMT or crystal are damaged because the unit was mistreated or accidentally dropped, the detector goes in the garbage bin but if they were treated well and are in a good, working condition, the detector can provide excellent post-service life as a Gamma Scintillator (Counting or Gamma Spectroscopy probe) - I routinely measure the FWHM resolution to be better than 7% (@662keV) for the 38B57 detectors. This makes it an excellent choice for those who need a scintillator probe, are just beginning and want to try Gamma Spectroscopy and are on a budget.
I, actually started my Gamma Spectroscopy experiments years ago with such detector.
As the detectors are removed from the Exloranium GR-135 units and sold on eBay, they are not directly useable - they have a custom voltage divider circuit with transistors and diodes in the last stages, intended for use with the GR-135 hardware and must be modified with a "standard" voltage-divider circuit to get the best performance for both, linearity and resolution. Even the original connectors and the way they are powered is specific to the GR-135 unit. People have tried to use them without any modification, but the results are not great, and linearity is very poor.
The simple and easy to do modification brings it to a completely new level and one will be rewarded with a very capable detector once it is done.
The modification process consists of removing the original voltage divider, installing a "classic" VD circuit with appropriate impedance and mounting a coaxial connector on the housing.
This modification is not difficult but requires basic electronics, soldering and mechanical skills and one should be comfortable, working with SMD components in order to perform the procedure.
Modification
Funny enough, the most difficult part of the modification process is opening and removing the rear aluminum cap of the detector.
Enemy #3 of these inorganic scintillating crystals are rapid temperature changes which can cause the crystal to crack. (Enemy #1 is moisture and Enemy #2 is mechanical shock)
It requires quite a bit of heat for the adhesive to fail and let the cap go.
Inserting the blade of the utility knife between the edge of the tube and the cap while hot, allows for the cap to be pried off - this action must be carried out repeatedly at different spots around the perimeter of the cap until it comes off.
If the cap doesn't budge initially, just reheat quickly to a higher temperature, while monitoring the temperature of the crystal housing and once the cap is open, slowly cool down the top, hot edge, of the stainless-steel tube.
The aluminum cap can retain heat, so the process is as follows - heat up the cap and the edge of the stainles-steel tube, then quickly put down the heat-gun and try to pry it off with the utility knife, then repeat it as many times as needed while changing the position around the perimeter of the cap.
Once the utility knife blade widens the gap enough to slip in a flat-head screwdriver between the edge of the stainless-steel tube and the rim of the cap, things will become easy - twisting the screwdriver applies quite a bit of force to pry the cap open.
Most caps will come off quickly and easily, but some might have an excessive amount of glue and can be "tough cookies" to crack.
Next step is to remove the silicone sealant, cables and the cable grommet.
DO NOT try to remove the stainless-steel tube from the bottom, aluminum part of the housing in order to gain better access to the PCB - it is not needed, and any such attempts could lead to the destruction of the detector!
All of the work on the PCB is carried out through the back opening.
I cut the cables for this picture, but actually the wires should be de-soldered and completely removed. The picture shows the original Voltage Divider, with the transistors in the last stages. It is a tapered VD and the total impedance is fairly low - around 12MOhms.
Most components of the original VD must be removed, and some will be replaced with different values. The only components that stay are the 3 capacitors shown on the picture - everything else, marked with red "X" in this picture, must be de-soldered.
The best and fastest way to remove these SMD resistors is using 2 soldering irons equipped with fine tips (I use ETP tips for this task with my Weller stations). This method also carries less chance for PCB damage. Each resistor is heated simultaneously on both sides and picked up by the two soldering iron tips as if tweezers are used. It takes me just a few minutes to remove all of the unnecessary components. Solder wick is used to clean the pads and prepare them for the new resistors. The old soldering flux can be cleaned off with alcohol pads or alcohol-soaked Q-tips.This picture shows how the PCB should look like after de-soldering the original voltage divider. 3 out of the 4 SMD capacitors (10nF/200V) are left in place. The 4th capacitor on the very left is removed and later a resistor will be installed in this position.I used 10 Mohm / 1/4W / 1206/ 0.1% tolerance resistors - Digikey part # 749-MCA1206MD1005BP500CT-ND - Vishay High Stability chip resistors.
Resistance tolerance is not super-critical as there are small factory differences in the PMT's Dynode stages to begin with. Thick film resistors with 1% tolerance, should work just as well and they will be more economical.
All resistors should be installed as shown on the picture.
(tip: buying these resistors in quantity of 100 or 500 pcs from Digikey is more cost-effective, especially if more than one detector is modified - each detector needs 12 resistors)
Key points on the picture above:
A. Resistor is installed on the pads of the previously removed capacitor.
B. Resistor is installed on top of the capacitor and in parallel, soldering the resistor terminals to the capacitor's terminals.
C. Two resistors in series are installed between Dy1 and K. Single 2xR resistor (in this case 20M) can also be used but I found to be more convenient if I use 2 resistors as the distance between the pads allows for this, looks clean and helps if 2R is not one of the standard values.
The yellow and black wires (silver-plated stranded wire with Teflon insulation) are soldered to the BNC connector. These wires are about 1" long (actually, they can be a bit shorter than this) and are carefully bent in a spiral fashion and routed in a way not to touch the board or components when the cap is closed.
I also seal the seam between the aluminum part of the housing and the stainless-steel tube with a strip of Kapton tape - just for "good measure".
Is it possible to run this detector at 900V when using the 10 MOhm resistors?
ReplyDeleteI would not recommend it - the nominal voltage seems to be around 650V even with the 10M resistors. It can tolerate up to 750V without issues.
ReplyDeleteAt 900V the detector will be completely useless for spectroscopy and even in counting mode it will produce excessive amount of pulses.
I've done test runs at 900V in counting mode and if activity is increases, I have seen runway/avalanche pulsing where the count rate will just skyrocket until the power is turned off - not healthy for the PMT for sure.
Consider using it at 650-700V.
Thanks you. Would it be feasible to drop the meter voltage from 900V to ~700V using a series resistor or a high voltage diode? Do you think a diode or resistor would work better to drop the voltage for use in counting mode?
DeleteIt is a bit complicated to drop the voltage post-power supply for number of reasons - on one hand you want to maintain high impedance to the Power Supply so the current doesn't sink the voltage, on the other you still want to supply enough current for the PMT to work. A voltage divider with 12M/60M for example will drop the voltage from 900 to 750 but you'll need to consider the effects of the PMT's VD impedance and will limit the supplied current.
ReplyDeleteIf your detector VD impedance is 60M - a 12M series resistor will form this divider - BUT - you are limiting the current even further and you need to add it BEFORE the tap for the decoupling capacitor - otherwise, you'll be affecting the PMT's output pulses as well.
Also, I haven't measure what is the current required for the PMT to work correctly.
I would try to see if the voltage can be changed by the PS circuit rather than dropping it afterwards.
Alternatively, you can try to measure the voltage across a few different resistors connected across your output (with at least 1 GOhm multimeter probe) and determine what impedance sinks the voltage down to 750V and then build the VD of the detector with such total impedance. This is not the best way to do it for sure but could work for you.